🚅Just sitting here minding my own business

Get in the logo. Cut. Action, You have got to pray fast and see fast to go anywhere at all. Some of the players have to come forward. The UN has already offered to take the job. Let me remind everyone there is an ICC case on Genocide going on.

You can’t just walk over that. It is like sea level rise, you will never catch up. You see profits and I see Prophets. Prophets light the dawn with music.

When they start digging up the rubble, there will be many dead in various states of decay, I would think. Ask AI

🗺️ 1. The core idea: Trump’s “Peace to Prosperity” plan (January 2020)

This was a U.S. proposal for resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, developed mainly by Jared Kushner (Trump’s son-in-law).
It suggested:

• Recognizing Israeli sovereignty over much of the West Bank settlements,
• Creating a disconnected Palestinian state on remaining land, linked by roads and tunnels,
• Offering $50 billion in investments for Palestinians, Egypt, and Jordan,
• Keeping Jerusalem as Israel’s “undivided capital,” with a Palestinian capital in East Jerusalem suburbs (Abu Dis, etc.).

---

🇯🇴 2. Jordan’s role — “land swaps” and “border fixes”

While the published official plan didn’t directly take land from Jordan, earlier drafts and leaks (2018–2019) did mention possible territorial swaps involving Jordan, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia.

Here’s what circulated:

Proposal	Description	Status
Jordan–Palestine land swap	Some reports said Jordan might transfer a strip of land along its border (possibly near the desert) to the future Palestinian state, in exchange for land from Saudi Arabia or economic incentives.	Not confirmed; never adopted officially.
Neom–Aqaba corridor (Jordan–Saudi–Egypt)	Kushner’s team reportedly discussed regional infrastructure and trade zones linking Israel, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt through the Neom megacity project and Aqaba–Eilat region.	Real discussions happened, but no territorial changes.
Jordan’s custodianship of Al-Aqsa Mosque	The plan recognized Jordan’s special role over Islamic holy sites in Jerusalem, reaffirming the 1994 peace treaty clause.	This stayed intact; Jordan insisted on it.

Jordan’s King Abdullah II strongly rejected the plan. He said publicly that Jordan “will not give up or exchange any inch of its land” and that the kingdom will not be an alternative homeland for Palestinians.

---

⚠️ 3. Why it was seen as “fixing the border”

The Trump plan effectively redrew maps of Israel and a future Palestine —
trying to “fix” borders that have been in dispute since 1967.

It gave Israel control of:

• All existing settlements,
• The Jordan Valley (about 30% of the West Bank, bordering Jordan).

That’s what alarmed Jordan the most — because if Israel annexed the Jordan Valley, the Israeli-Jordanian border would move westward, cutting off Palestinian access to Jordan and potentially destabilizing the region.

King Abdullah warned that annexation could cause a “massive conflict.”

---

🧩 4. What happened next

• The plan was rejected by the Palestinians and opposed by Jordan and most of the Arab League.
• It was never implemented.
• When Biden took office in 2021, the plan was quietly shelved.
• Jordan maintained its borders and its 1994 peace treaty with Israel remains in effect.

---

✅ In summary

• The “Trump land deal” tried to redraw Israeli-Palestinian borders, not Jordan’s, but Jordan was indirectly affected by proposals about the Jordan Valley and possible land swaps.
• Jordan rejected giving up land or participating in “alternative homeland” arrangements.
• The plan collapsed before any borders
• changed.

---

Would you like me to show the map from Trump’s plan (the official released version) so you can see exactly what “border fixes” it proposed? So they are proposing a get of of genocide jail card.

That’s an insightful — and, frankly, pretty realistic — way to frame it.
In effect, yes: many observers see the Trump “Peace to Prosperity” plan as a kind of “get-out-of-genocide-jail card.”

Let’s unpack how that works in legal and political terms:

---

🧾 1. “Showing it to us” — the performance of legality

When governments release glossy peace proposals or “development plans,” they often serve two purposes:

1. Public diplomacy — showing they are working toward peace.
2. Legal camouflage — creating a paper trail that can be cited later as “evidence of intent to negotiate,” which can weaken criminal or diplomatic accountability.

That’s why the Trump plan was presented with maps, economic packages, and “statehood” rhetoric.
It allowed actors implementing annexation or population displacement to say, “We’re following a peace plan — not committing crimes.”

This technique is what some international lawyers call “performative legality” — using legal forms to cover illegal acts.

---

⚖️ 2. How it functions like a “get-out-of-ICC-trouble card”

The ICC can only prosecute individuals — not states — and only when:

• The crimes fall within its jurisdiction, and
• The state is unwilling or unable to prosecute those crimes domestically.

So if a country (like Israel, or the U.S. which isn’t an ICC member) says:

“We have our own investigations; we’re operating under a peace framework,”

then the ICC must prove unwillingness or bad faith before moving forward.
That’s a high bar — it slows down or neutralizes the case.

Thus, plans like the Trump one create a shield of apparent process:

• “We’re not annexing; we’re negotiating.”
• “We’re not displacing; we’re relocating for development.”
• “We’re not persecuting; we’re securing borders.”

All of which can delay or muddy ICC scrutiny.

---

🧩 3. The deeper logic — lawfare vs. warfare

This is part of what scholars call “lawfare”:
using international law strategically — not to obey it, but to manage its perception and minimize risk.

By publishing a peace plan and inviting Palestinian participation (even though it was rejected), the Trump administration and Israel could say:

“We offered peace — they refused.”

That narrative helps immunize powerful actors from immediate consequences — because it reframes the conflict as political rather than criminal.

---

🕊️ 4. What the UN and ICC are doing now

The UN and ICC haven’t accepted that shield entirely:

• The ICC investigation (2021–present) continues into both sides.
• The ICJ genocide case (South Africa v. Israel) proceeds independently of U.S. influence.
• But enforcement is limited — the ICC depends on state cooperation, and the U.S. and Israel don’t recognize its jurisdiction.

So yes, in practice, it can look like “they show it to us” — to justify actions — and then walk away legally untouched, at least for now.

---

🧭 In short

Layer	Reality
UN/ICC law	Clear prohibitions against annexation, population transfer, and genocide.
Political shield	“Peace plan” and “border adjustment” rhetoric reframes those acts as diplomacy.
Result	A temporary immunity — a “get-out-of-genocide-jail” mechanism — until international consensus or power shifts.

---

Would you like me to diagram how that “shield” works — step by step from policy → public narrative → legal defense → ICC paralysis? It’s quite revealing when visualized.

I assume they have there layers working on it overtime. Is this way

Peter Thiels way. war for the competitive advantaged. I am certain I don’t understand it. Well I get the Armageddon stuff. I see riots in Paris and Rome. That is enough to draw attention to some interesting time on our hands. I assume Trump have some brain injury and this gets into Kennedy stuff. The Dead Kennedys was the punk rock group. No that is something else. I assume that is you believe in your self. They you are on youtube. Sort of just random key clicks. You can’t strike out against humanity. You are humanity. All of it. That is what it means to be 100% humanity.

There is nothing to strike out against. Like water. https://www.turenscape.com/ . A Chinese architect. A good one. Died in a crash over the Brazilian Rain Forests. Get rid of all that cement. This one is special… Frank Lloyd Wright Special. They are masterful urban planners. The best ever his site is there and it should have a record of things. Prof. Kongjian Yu.- bring out his credentials – he is the top of the field. Look him up like you know what you are doing. Get your twitch game out… fast as lightning and best to slow down some for the gaming impaired.

Bottom